|
Your real digital future, don't kid yourself. |
"I am who I am today because of the choices i made yesterday" - Eleanor Roosevelt
Should one’s past be held
against you for the rest of your life, and beyond, or should you be allowed to
retreat into obscurity? This debate is a fascinating example of how far removed
most commentators, legislators and regulators are from the technology which is
driving the question in the first place. From the usual points of view this is
being driven by people who don’t want youthful and trivial discretions to be
held against people thirty years later. This is partially a red herring, there
will always be finger prints of past actions available, in the decades and
centuries before the internet it was called a reputation and no one was taken
seriously without one, for good or bad. What this particular legislative demand
is about isn’t the right to be forgotten, it’s about wanting to edit your past,
to edit your online reputation to remove the sleazy bits. Now various people
will champ at the bit and state that the right to correct errors is vital. But who
chooses what is an error and who chooses to edit it? the moment you open that
particular Pandora’s box a world of nasties can explode from political figures
editing their pasts to criminals attempting to slide away from the consequences
of their actions.